Toiiiiiiiiiiiwo social psychological theories of aggression

Banduras Social Learning Theory suggests that bends of aggression are learnt finished the observation of role models. His original Bobo Doll study showed that when exposed to self-assertive behavior small children copied this behavior, not just by macrocosm physically offensive but even copying the verbally militant behavior. hitherto this study focuses on children who are supposed to learn in this manner, this doesnt turn out that this would also be true in older children or adults who already puddle a set moral compass that would intercede with copying aggressive behaviors.However Banduras later study showed that if children saw soulfulness dismount punished for aggressive behavior they were less likely to be aggressive themselves when they were allowed to play with the bobo doll but if they saw someone get rewarded for this aggressive behavior then they were much more likely to act aggressively themselves, this shows that vicarious reinforcement is important to the le arning of aggression through and through the social learning theory, as receiving direct positive reinforcement leads to great(p) number having high self efficacy making them very likely to double over the aggressive demeanor that they were rewarded for.In terms of aggression this reward could come in many forms such as acceptance from a violent gang up they want to be a part of or just concern from a parent or teacher. Moreover, Walter and Thomas study in 1963 further support this theory as the results of the study demonstrated that aggressive behavior was a result of imitation of role models. However, the social learning theory does not explain what triggers aggression. Additionally, the study emphasizes nurture and learning through observation ignoring temperament and biological explanations.On the other hand, Zimbardos theory of Deindividuation suggests that aggressive behavior occurs in congregations as a persons normal constraints become gelded when they are part of a group as they take of the identity of the crowd as they feel that when part of a group their possess actions are no longer bad making aggressive deportment easier as they do not seem it as themselves carrying out the aggressive behaviour but the group as a whole as they become faceless, just part of the group not an somebody.Comm scarcely members of violent or aggressive groups have a reduced private self consciousness as they have some kind of tie to the rest of the group that makes them become a faceless member of the crowd, examples of this are common items of habilitate in gangs and at football matches as supporters wear the same garments and are all sat together. Zimbardo formed this theory around his Stanford prison house experiment where when the guards were giving a common uniform they became much more aggressive in their behaviour towards the prisoners as they became guards so felt that as a guard behaviour they would normally not see as acceptable suddenly became th e appropriate response to their own frustrations.However in demarcation line with this the prisoners were all deindividuated but apart from one small failed act of revolution they did not become aggressive, in fact they became more obedient and passive, this suggests the Deindividuation of an individual as part of a group only leads to aggressive behaviour if aggression is what is expected of the group such as violence being the expected behaviour from teenage gangs.Like Banduras Social Learning Theory, this doesnt explain what causes aggression but this does suggest that in some causes individuals themselves do not feel any kind of cue for the aggression they demonstrate but act in that way because the rest of the group does explaining how large scale acts of aggression can commonly occur as it could only require a small number of people to actually have a cue such as frustration to trigger the aggressive behaviour.