Research critique part 2 Essay

Quantitative Research CritiqueThis is a quantitative sketch research critique of the research domain conducted by Lisa M desolate PhD,RN,CNE, Tragedy into Policy A Quantitative Study of Nurses Attitudes Toward Patient protagonism Activities. The findings from this research battleground was used in the severalise of Nevada to cling to nurses when inform unsafe conditions in longanimous care practices, thus providing a safer pass environment where nurses can feel safe when speaking let out where forbearing safety is in jeopardy from unsafe care practices. Protection of military man ParticipantsThe benefits of this study were the creation of legal protection for whistleblowers in the state of Nevada. thither were no risks to any participants safety for this study. Informed consent was not call for as retuning the humpd survey was viewed as consent to be included. each(prenominal) participation in the study was viewed as voluntary. Approval of the survey legal instrument was obtained from the University of Nevada, Reno prior to beginning data collection. (Black, 2011, p. 29) data CollectionThe dependent variables in this study are the registered nurses licensed to practice in the state of Nevada the main(a) variable was the Registered Nurses Workplace Support for Patient Advocacy Activities Study Questionnaire.(Black, 2011, p. 29) Data was collected through the developed questionnaire that was sent to 1725 registered nurses with active, current licensure and residing in the state of Nevada at the sentence of the survey.(Black, 2011, p. 29) The author provided no rationale for using the chosen data collection method, I would assume that this was the most cost powerful and best way to maintain privacy for all respondents. The surveys were sent out using the United States Postal Service on September 8, 2008.(Black, 2011, p. 30) The respondents were asked to accomplish the survey by one of two methods, filling out, and returning the opus survey via US postal service or by completing it online. All responses were accepted through October 31, 2008. (Black, 2011, p. 30) After distribution of the questionnaire respondents were given the time period listed September 8, 2008 through October 31, 2008 to respond to the survey either scripted or online. (Black, 2011, p. 30) Data Management and AnalysisA priori power abstract was performed and established that a minimum sample of 405 respondents would be required to bring out a medium effect size.(Black, 2011, p. 29) In order to determine if the study sample was demographically representative of nurses in Nevada, the demographic data was compared to the data from the 2004 field of study Sample Survey of Registered Nurses from Nevada. (Black, 2011, p. 29) Reliability testing of the survey tool demonstrate a high degree of internal consistency. (Black, 2011, p. 30) No statistical software system was mentioned in this study.Other than the reliability testing performed, the survey results were calculated with a total of 564 reasoned responses collected this represented 33% response rate. (Black, 2011, p. 30) repartee number varied from item to item as most participants leave one or more items blank. (Black, 2011, p. 30) I felt this study was a reliable source of information concerning legislation protecting whistleblowers from oeuvre retaliation. correspond to the priori power analysis the minimum sample necessary of 405 respondents was required with 564 valid responses received the minimum sample size was met. (Black, 2011, p. 29)The limitations that are identified in this study were, the sample size was considered to be small, even with the randomly chosen sample there was a potential response bias, and due to the nurses who consume negative work environments may be more likely to complete the questionnaire than those with a more positive one. (Black, 2011, p. 33) This acquired the potential for inflated representation of the oftenness and severity of these experiences. (Black, 2011, p. 33) This is the reason for caution when applying the findings to nurses outside of this study. (Black, 2011, p. 33) The survey tool did not allow for differentiation of different types of unsafe situations or different levels of retaliation. (Black, 2011, p. 34) meter reading of survey questions may vary from one respondent to another.(Black, 2011, p. 34) This research study was presented in a logical easily understood manner with news report and definition of findings and limitations. The findings of this study to were used in the creation of a fair play protecting nurses reporting unsafe patient care practices in shrill care facilities and free standing offices and clinics in Nevada. The creation of this legislation helps create an environment for nurses to carry out their moral imperative to prevent defile to patients whenever possible and to report potential or actual causes of harm to protect patients.(Black, 2011, p. 35) There were no suggestions for future research. There was suggestion for changes in workplace environments encouraging openness in communication and especially in cases where patient safety is a concern. (Black, 2011, p. 35)