Balancing Federal Budget

Jared Owen Revenues (in millions of dollars) Individual Income Taxes Corporate Income Taxes sociable Insurance and Retirement profit Excise Taxes Other Total 2011 Federal Bud turn back 1,091,473 181,085 818,792 72,381 139,735 2,303,466 Your Budget $1,391,473 $187,946 $800,000 $65,256 $159,000 $2,603,675 difference of opinion +$300,000 +$6,861 -$18,792 -$7,125 +$19,265 +$303,166 Expenditures (in millions of dollars) 050 National Defense Total-Spending categories 150-450 500 Education 550 Health 570 Medicare 600 Income certificate 650 Social Security Total-Spending categories 700-950 Total 2011 Federal Budget 705,625 257,662 101,233 372,500 485,653 597,352 730,811 352,225 3,603,061 Your Budget $505,644 $200,632 $110,000 $250,500 $479,222 $407,123 $450,351 200,203 2,603,675 Difference -$199,981 -$57,030 +$8,767 -$122,000 -$6,431 -$190,229 -$280,460 -$152,022 -$999,386 I am going to raise the individual income tax which might petulance people however I am lowering the excise taxes w hich is for gas, etc.I am also raising corporate income taxes because big franchise companies can sacrifice to give up some of their income to be able to give to a greater extent elsewhere. I thought lowering the social insurance and retirement proceeds was a good idea because at that place are programs and benefits that are already implemented into this and the extra money will be put in areas that do not have extra help and rely sightly on the money inflow. I increased the other category because since it incorporates quaternary programs, the big increase will be spread across a lot of different programs therefore, to each individual program it will not be a big increase.I lowered the National Defense using up because since we won the war overseas, we are bringing more than and more host home and even though it is not a total calmness time, we do not have to spend as more as the year before. I actually increased what is spend on fostering because that is very important t o our country and the more educated people there are, the more jobs people will be able to get which in turn kernel they make more money then they would without education. This means that more money will increase the gross domestic product and make the parsimony grow.Unfortunately, I had to cut some spending in the health and medicare areas scarcely there are programs and benefits that help these areas so it is not as much as a loss and the plain numbers show. I diminish the social security because this government spending does not count towards the GDP which means it does nothing for the economy. These people can afford to take a minor pay cut in order for that money to be used in other areas that will help the economy grow. I hangd the income security because of the different acts such as The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 which protect these people in said programs.The decrease in both total spending categories are appropriate, again, because they include m ultiple areas that already have benefits implemented in them. This means that a small decrease in many areas will give a bigger total of money to be spent in other areas. In conclusion, the areas that carry to be changed are the ones that will make the population spend more in our country to increase our GDP and in turn get our economy back on track. By doing this, we are getting our economy under control which will lead to it becoming easier to balance the federal budget.